Populism and literature: Mapping the debate on Houellebecq‘s Soumission [Bilingual edition: Spanish – English]
Keywords:
Populism, Houellebecq, Contemporary French Literature, IslamizationAbstract
The recent rise of populism is a topic that has been widely investigated, particularly in the field of political science (Laclau 2005; Mudde 2017; Müller 2016; Žižek 2006). However, the question arises whether populism should only be considered as a purely political phenomenon, or can also be studied from a cultural perspective: through literature, cinema and visual culture for example. The relationship between populism and culture is normally seen as one of mutual exclusion – populism dismisses culture as a waste of time and money, while culture perceives and represents populism as its disturbing Other. But on the other hand, populism‘s own active use of culture tends to be underestimated.
In this present article, I will illustrate these aspects by analyzing the reception of a controversial novel, namely Soumission by Michel Houellebecq (2015). This text has been widely investigated by scholars (Jones 2016; Rosenthal 2015; Spieser-Landes 2017); at the same time, far less scholarly attention has been paid to the cultural appropriation of the text on the part of populist politicians and media. By mapping the public debate on Soumission through a variety of sources (reviews, newspaper articles, interviews, etc.), I will illustrate how French populists have used Houellebecq‘s novel to define their political agenda, with particular regard to the alleged ‘Islamization‘ or ‘Africanization‘ of Europe. On the other hand, we will see that these populist interpretations fail to grasp the complexity of the work.
Downloads
References
BAKHTIN, M. (Ed.). (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (C. Emerson Trans.). Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
BARONI, R. & ESTIER, S. (2016). Peut-on lire Houellebecq ? Un cas d‘illisibilité contemporaine. Fabula-LhT, n° 16, « Crises de lisibilité », 2016, URL : http://www.fabula.org/lht/16/baroni-estier.html.
BAX, S. (2016). The Public Intellectual as a Literary Populist. Leon de Winter's Public Authorship. [De publieke intellectueel als literair populist] Nederlandse Letterkunde, 21(2), 97-129.
BETTY, L. (2012). “Michel Houellebecq, meet Maximilien Robespierre”: A Study in Social Religion. L‘Erudit Franco-Espagnol, 1, 19-33.
BOOTH, W. (1974). A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
BRUBAKER, R. (2017). Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Movement in Comparative Perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40 (8), 1191-1226
CANOVAN, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16.
CARLSON, J. (2011). La Poétique de Houellebecq: Réalisme, Satire, Mythe. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg (Sweden), Gothenburg.
HAWKINS, K. (2010). Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
JONES, D. M. (2016). It's not 'them', it's 'us'. Policy, 32(1), 48-53.
KERNAN, A. (1959). The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. New Haven : Yale Studies in English.
KOMOROWSKA, A. (2016). „Mais c'est d'une ambiguité étrange“: die Rezeption von Michel Houellebecqs Roman ‚Soumission‘ in Frankreich und Deutschland. Romanische Studien, 2(3), 137–169. URL: http://romanischestudien.de/index.php/rst/article/view/116/311
KORTHALS ALTES, L. (2014). Ethos and Narrative Interpretation: The Negotiation of Values in Fiction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
LLOYD, V. (2009). Michel Houellebecq and the Theological Virtues. Literature and Theology, 23(1), 84-98.
MACKELLAR, L. (2016). La République Islamique de France? A review study. Population and Development Review, 42(2), 368-375.
MUDDE, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563.
MUDDE, C., & KALTWASSER, C. (2017). Populism, a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
MUDDE, C. (2017). The Far Right in America. New York: Routledge .
MÌLLER, J. W. (2016). What is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
RANIERI, M. (2016). Populism, Media and Education: Challenging Discrimination in Contemporary Digital Societies. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
RENSMANN, L. (2017). The Noisy Counter-Revolution: Understanding the Cultural Conditions and Dynamics of Populist Politics in Europe and in the Digital Age. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 123-135
RODRIK, D. (2017). Populism and the Economics of Globalization. NBER Working Paper no. 23559.
ROSENTHAL, J. (2015). Houellebecq's 'Soumission'. World Affairs, 178(1), 76-84.
STRITZEL, H. (2014). Security in Translation: Securitization Theory and the Localization of Threat. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
TAGGART, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
UNGUREANU, C. (2017). Michel Houellebecq's Shifting Representation of Islam: From the Death of God to Counter-Enlightenment. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(4-5), 514-528.
VAN DIJK, T. (1995). Elites, Racism and the Press. Zeitschrift Für Literaturwissenschaft Und Linguistik, 25(1), 86-115.
WODAK, R. & MEYER, M. (Ed.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage
WODAK, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage
ZIZEK, S. (2006). Against the Populist Temptation. Critical Inquiry, 32(3), 551-574.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0) 
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
