Fighting breeds and athletes: how lobby groups frame animal-based entertainment in Spain
-
Olatz Aranceta-Reboredo
olatz.aranceta@upf.edu
-
Leire Morrás Aranoa
leire.morras@ehu.eus
-
Núria Almiron
nuria.almiron@upf.edu
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3771Abstract
Introduction: Despite growing moral concern over the use of animals in bullfighting, cockfighting, and horse and dog racing, these animal-based entertainment industries continue to exhibit significant resilience in Spain, driven largely by the strategic use of public relations. Aims/Objectives: To analyze the discourse disseminated by interest groups lobbying for the use of animals in these industries in Spain, with a focus on the representation of nonhuman animals, self-representation by the industries and representation of the public, to assess how these discursive practices affect the emergence of compassion. Methodology: A multimodal analysis from a Critical Animal Studies perspective. We examined a sample of texts, informative materials, videos and newspaper articles displayed and disseminated by four primary interest groups: Fundación Toro de Lidia (a foundation promoting and defending bullfighting culture in Spain), Asociación de Sociedades Organizadoras de Carreras de Caballos en España / Asociación de Hipódromos (the association of horse racing event organizers and racetracks in Spain), Federación Española de Galgos (the Spanish federation governing greyhound racing and breeding), and Unión de Criadores de Gallo Combatiente Español (the union of breeders of the Spanish fighting cock). Results: The main findings of this research highlight the interplay between spectacle, tradition, science and economic interest —mediated through the biologization and athleticization of animals— as well as the roles of Spanish nationalism, victimization narratives, and warlike framing. Discussion: The discourse incorporates fallacious reasoning alongside polarizing rhetoric, the instrumentalization of culture, science and tradition, and strategies of humane-washing and greenwashing. Conclusions: Compassion towards animals is reframed in ways that delegitimize the ethical concern expressed by citizens, while portraying the industries’ own activities as the true expression of care and responsibility.
Palabras Clave
Almiron, N., & Khazaal, N. (2016). Lobbying Against Compassion Speciesist Discourse in the Vivisection Industrial Complex. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613402
Almiron, N., Fernández, L., & Rodrigo-Alsina, M. (2024). Illusory authenticity: Negotiating compassion in animal experimentation discourse. Discourse Studies, 26(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231219633
Anderson, V. D. (2004). Creatures of Empire: How domestic animals transformed early America. Oxford university press.
ANOET (2024). Respuesta de la EITB al comunicado de ANOET. Anoet. https://anoet.com/category/noticias/#:~:text=VER%20INFORME%20ANOET%202024&text=El%20total%20es%20de%2020.950,1.537%20de%20novilladas%20sin%20caballos
Aranceta-Reboredo, O., & Almiron, N. (2024). Commodifying compassion: A critical discourse analysis of Spanish zoo, aquarium and animal theme parks’ lobbies. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1464190
Carter, N. (2024). Harvesting Denial, Distractions, & Deception: Understanding Animal Agriculture’s Disinformation Strategies and Exploring Solutions. Freedom Food Alliance. https://www.freedomfoodalliance.org/thereport
Changing Markets Foundation (2023). Truth, Lies and Culture Wars. Social listening analysis of meat and dairy persuasion narratives. Changing Markets Foundation. https://changingmarkets.org/report/truth-lies-and-culture-wars-social-listening-analysis-of-meat-and-dairy-persuasion-narratives/
____ (2024). The New Merchants of Doubt. The corporate playbook by Big Meat and Dairy to distract, delay, and derail climate action (p. 265). Changing Markets Foundation. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Report-The-New-Merchants-of-Doubt_Final.pdf
Charaudeau, P. (2013). El discurso de la información: La construcción del espejo social. Gedisa.
Codina-Segovia, J. I. (2018). Pan y toros: Breve historia del pensamiento antitaurino español. Plaza y Valdés.
Colling, S., Parson, S., & Arrigoni, A. (2014). Until All Are Free: Total Liberation through Revolutionary Decolonization, Groundless Solidarity, and a Relationship Framework. Counterpoints, 448, 51–73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42982377
Cordeiro-Rodrigues, L., & Achino, E. (2017). A Case Study on Moral Disengagement and Rationalization in the Context of Portugese Bullfighting. Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne, 3, 315–327. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26383078
Díaz, E. M. (2019). Emerging Attitudes towards Nonhuman Animals among Spanish University Students. Society & Animals, 27(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341490
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Equine Ethics and Wellbeing Commission (EEWB) (2022). Results of general public survey – Equine Ethics and Wellbeing Commission Report 2022. International Equestrian Federation (FEI). https://equinewellbeing.fei.org/assets/documents/Results%20of%20General%20Public%20Survey%20-%20%20Equine%20Ethics%20and%20Wellbeing%20Commission%20Report%202022.pdf
Faria, C., & Castellano, J. (2024). Lenguaje especista y caza. In Faria, C., & Almiron, N. (Eds.), Especismo y Lenguaje (pp. 173–184). Plaza y Valdés.
Federación Española de Galgos (2024a). 2025. LXXXVII CAMPEONATO DE ESPAÑA DE GALGOS EN CAMPO COPA S. M. EL REY. Fedegalgos.Com. https://www.fedegalgos.com/project_category/campeonatos/
____ (2024b). Genealogía participantes LXXXVII CTO de España de galgos en campo. Fedegalgos.Com. https://www.fedegalgos.com/genealogia-participantes-lxxxvii-cto-de-espana-de-galgoa-en-campo/
____ (n.d.-a). Historia. Fedegalgos.Com. Retrieved 10 June 2025, from https://www.fedegalgos.com/federacion-espanola-galgos/historia/
____ (n.d.-b). Reglamento. Fedegalgos.Com. https://www.fedegalgos.com/federacion-espanola-galgos/reglamento/
Franklin, S. (2001). Biologization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of the New Biologies. In Franklin, S. & McKinnon, S. (Eds.), Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies (pp. 302–326). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822383222-014
Fundación BBVA (2022). Estudio Fundación BBVA. Visión y Actitudes hacia los Animales en la Sociedad Española. Departamento de Estudios Sociales y Opinión Pública.
____ (2025). Estudio Fundación BBVA Percepciones de la naturaleza y los animales. Departamento de Estudios Sociales y Opinión Pública. https://www.fbbva.es/noticias/estudio-opinion-publica-animales-espana-2025/
Gamecock Fowl (n.d.). Cockfighting glossary. Gamecock Fowl. https://gamecockfowl.blogspot.com/p/cockfighting-glossary.html
Gilpérez-Fraile, L. (2016). Las burdas trolas del informe “los toros en españa: un gran impacto económico con mínimas subvenciones. ASANDA. https://asanda.org/descargas/documentos/taurinos/las-burdas-trolas-del-informe-201clos-toros-en-espana-un-gran-impacto-economico-con-minimas-subvenciones201d
Gómez-Pellón, E. (2017). Los problemas del patrimonio inmaterial: Uso y abuso de los animales en España. AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 12(02), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.120204
Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hervas, A. (July 21st, 2025). Los toros con Agustín Hervás: La EITB reconoce el error grave al calificar en el Teleberri de “asesinatos” la lidia de toros tras una queja de la Fundación Toro de Lidia. LOS TOROS CON AGUSTÍN HERVÁS. https://lostorosconagustinhervas.blogspot.com/2025/07/la-eitb-reconoce-el-error-grave-al.html
Jordano, J. R. (July 8th, 2025). ANOET exige a EiTB una rectificación por decir que los toros de los sanfermines serán ‘lidiados y asesinados’. Libertad Digital - Cultura. https://www.libertaddigital.com/cultura/toros/2025-07-08/anoet-exige-a-eitb-una-rectificacion-por-decir-que-los-toros-de-los-sanfermines-seran-lidiados-y-asesinados-7274160/
Krásná, D. (2022). Animal Colonialism in North America: Milk Colonialism, Environmental Racism, and Indigenous Veganism. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Studia Territorialia, 22(1), 61–90. DOI: 10.14712/23363231.2022.9
Lázaro-Terol, S. (2025). Prácticas de racialización, (dis)capacidad y performances de desdomesticación. Animal Ethics Review, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31009/aer.2025.v5.08
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2020). Introduction to multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350069176
Marcos, F. (2015). Entertainment Made in Spain: Competition in the Bullfighting Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568397
María, G. A., Mazas, B., Zarza, F. J., & Miranda-De-La-Lama, G. C. (2017). Animal Welfare, National Identity and Social Change: Attitudes and Opinions of Spanish Citizens Towards Bullfighting. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(6), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9700-9
Medina-García‑Hierro, J., & Gutiérrez-López, M. (2016). Los Toros en España: Un gran impacto económico con mínimas subvenciones. Asociación Nacional de Organizadores de Espectáculos Taurinos (ANOET).
Miller, D., & Dinan, W. (2008). A century of spin: How public relations became the cutting edge of corporate power. Pluto Press.
Miller, J. (2014). Empire and the Animal Body: Violence, Identity and Ecology in Victorian Adventure Fiction. Anthem Press.
Ministerio de Cultura (España) (May 8th, 2025). Estadística de asuntos taurinos 2024. Cultura.gob.es. https://www.cultura.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/cultura/mc/culturabase/asuntos-taurinos.html
Moreno, J. A., & Almiron, N. (2024). Climate Obstruction in Spain: From Boycotting the Expansion of Renewable Energy to Blocking Compassion Toward Animals. In Brulle, R. J., Roberts, J. T., & Spencer, M. C. (Eds.), Climate Obstruction across Europe (1st ed., pp. 294–319). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197762042.003.0012
Mosterín, J. (2010). A favor de los toros (1era ed.). Editorial Laetoli.
Mulà, A. (2018). Análisis jurídico, antecedentes y consecuencias de la sentencia 177/2016, del Tribunal Constitucional, sobre prohibición de las corridas de toros en Cataluña. Revista de Derecho de la UNED (RDUNED), (22), 407–436. https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.22.2018.22285
Mundotoro (May 31st, 2020). Desmontando mentiras De un ‘pseudo-estudio’, publicado en El Diario. Mundotoro. https://www.mundotoro.com/noticia/mentiras-tauromaquia-estudio-el-diario/1555458
Nemes, N., Scanlan, S. J., Smith, P., Smith, T., Aronczyk, M., Hill, S., Lewis, S. L., Montgomery, A. W., Tubiello, F. N., & Stabinsky, D. (2022). An Integrated Framework to Assess Greenwashing. Sustainability, 14(8), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084431
Noske, B. (1997). Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Black Rose Books.
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought. The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Ontillera-Sánchez, R. (2019). Of casteadores, gallos y galleras the cockfight world in the Canary Islands [Doctoral thesis, University of Roehampton]. https://pure.roehampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/2774867/Of_casteadores_gallos_y_galleras.pdf
Pompa, E. (2025). Aquí puedes ver en directo la final del Campeonato de España de Galgos. Revista jaraysedal.es. https://revistajaraysedal.es/aqui-puedes-verdirecto-final-campeonato-espana-galgos/
Real Federación Hípica Española & CENRE Yeguada Cartuja (2022). II Estudio del impacto del sector ecuestre en España. Deloitte & Green Oak Group. Yeguadacartuja. https://yeguadacartuja.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/II-ESTUDIO-DEL-IMPACTO-DEL-SECTOR-ECUESTRE-EN-ESPANA_2022.pdf
Ruiz-Carreras, M. (2024). Unveiling the strategic discourse of european dairy industry pressure groups: A Critical Animal Studies perspective. TRACE: Journal for Human-Animal Studies, 10, 6–36. https://doi.org/10.23984/fjhas.136722
Schürch, I. (2020). Spectacular Spanish Horses in New Spain. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 37(3–4), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2020.1758671
Somany, N. (2023). Greenwashing in business: examining the impact of deceptive environmental claims on consumer behavior and corporate accountability. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 08(04), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i04.024
Stucki, S. (2017). (Certified) Humane Violence? Animal Welfare Labels, the Ambivalence of Humanizing the Inhumane, and What International Humanitarian Law Has to Do with It. AJIL Unbound, 111, 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2017.65
Tregar, K. L. (2020). Bison, Bears, and Borders: Animals and the Performance of National Communities [Doctoral thesis, University of California]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c12e939da8f0f42a3ac03a72dd485894/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Unión de Criadores de Gallos Combatiente Español (UCRIGA) (s.f.). Historia y curiosidades. UCRIGA. https://ucriga.es/historia-y-curiosidades/
Van-Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485). Blackwell Publishers.
Vicent, M., & El Roto (2017). Antitauromaquia (1st ed.). Literatura Random House.
Zaldívar-Laguía, J. E. (May 8th, 2020). El Estado no debe paliar los daños provocados por la pandemia a la industria taurina. elDiario.Es. https://www.eldiario.es/caballodenietzsche/paliar-provocados-pandemia-industria-taurina_132_5955770.html
Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the end times. Verso.
Similar Articles
- Lucia Bracco, Adriana Hildenbrand Mellet, Ana Sofia Carranza Risco, Valeria Lindley Llanos, Riots or collective claim actions? Press discourses during COVID-19 about Peruvian prisons and prisoners. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): January - June
- Baal Ulises Delupi, Carnival, all my life! Artivistic Resistance Speeches in Barcelona: The Case of Enmedio , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): January - June
- Teresa Velázquez García-Talavera, Marta Rizo García, The discourse of the far right and the crucial moments of political life , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 18 (2025): (Publishing on a rolling basis)
- Camilo Solís Mamani, The journalist as a strategic communicator: A new journalism myth? , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Gabriela Gallegos Martínez, Analysis of journalistic discourse about indigenous population: the case of Nuevo León, México. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): July - December
- José Luis Torres-Martín, Andrea Castro-Martínez, Pablo Díaz-Morilla, Cristina Pérez Ordóñez, Women executives and creators in the audiovisual sector. Analysis of Spanish fiction series in the catalogs of Amazon Prime Video, Movistar+, and Netflix (2019-2021) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): July - December
- Paula Pochintesta, María Florencia Baglione, Images about old age and ageing in Internet memes , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): July - December
- Emilia Hermelinda Lopera Pareja, The political debate on complementary and alternative medicine in Spain at the interface of science, politics and society (1979-2018) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Pablo Matus, Magdalena Vitores, Claudia Ramírez Friderichsen, Generic frames on the front covers of the Chilean press related to the social outbreak of 2019 , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): January - December
- Luis Fernando Baron Porras, Stefano Agostini, ICT and Migration in Latin American Pacific. Paths and trajectories of Pacific Colombian migrants , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): July - December
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olatz Aranceta Reboredo, Leire Morrás Aranoa, Núria Almiron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0)
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).









