Reflections on heteronormativity: the models and representations of family in a health web from multimodality.
-
Cynthia Vergara Maldonado
cynthiavergaram33@gmail.com
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48672020000100085Abstract
The family representations that Health Programs in Chile presuppose are disseminated through technological devices such as the web, created by makers of signs immersed in a culture with a historical, social, and political load about the family based on the construction of a family model valid within a particular Chilean society. Currently, affective and sexual relations between people include natural or technological forms of reproduction, which puts a strain on the traditional family model. This ruling provides room for other family models (homoparental) as opposed to the reproductive family of yesteryear based on men and women as the only form. The present article aims to provide a theoretical reflection on the family models that are institutionally disseminated through images with their respective visual text through the web. It proposes a multimodal analysis to address the visual texts of the Chile Grows with You Program, starting with an analysis of the representational function: actors, actions, and circumstances (Kress y Leeuwen, 2006). We conclude that the images correspond to the guiding text and refer to upbringing as a central theme, reinforcing gender roles as mother, father, and child, which assumes heteronormativity. It reflects on the representations of the family and its power as an institution, in addition to the potential of the media, such as the web, to promote ideologies and representations of family that allow the construction of a mental image to generate new representations of family different from the heteronormative one.
Palabras Clave
ABRIL, G. (2012): Tres dimensiones del texto y de la cultura visual. IC-Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación, 9, pp.15-35.
BEAUVOIR, S. (1949): El segundo sexo. Los hechos y los mitos. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI.
BERGER, P. y LUCKMANN, T. (2001): La construcción social de la Realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.
BOCCARDI, F y BOCCARDI, P. (2011): Tensiones sexuales de la familia. Una lectura de las configuraciones de la familia en el discurso social argentino. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 4 (2), pp. 68-78.
BOURDIEU, P. (1997): Razones prácticas sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona: Anagrama.
____ (1998): La dominación masculina. Barcelona: Anagrama.
BURIN, M. y MELER, I. (1998): Género y familia: Poder, amor y sexualidad en la construcción de la subjetividad. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
BUTLER, J. (1990): El género en disputa: El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
CHACÓN, F., IRIGOYEN, A., MESQUITA, E., y LOZANO, T. (Coords.) (2003): Sin distancias: Familia y tendencias historiográficas en el siglo XX. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
CONNELL, R. (1987): Gender and power. Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
DURKHEIM, E. (1892) : La famille conyugale. En DURKHEIM, E. (Ed.), Textes 3. Fonctions et institutions. PariÌs: Les Ëditions du Minuit, pp. 35-49.
DUSSAILLANT, J. (2016): La publicidad para la salud infantil en la prensa chilena (1860-1920). Cuadernos de historia (Santiago), 45, pp. 89-115. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-12432016000200004
DUVALL, E. (1977): Marriage and family development. New York, Lippincott.
ENGELS, F. (2005): El origen de la Familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado. España: Ediciones Fundación Federico Engels.
FALQUET, J. (2004): Breve reseña de algunas teóricas lésbicas. México D.F.: Editorial fem-e –libros.
FOUCAULT, M. (1978): Dispositivos de poder. Berlín: Merve.
____ (1999): Estrategias de poder. Obras esenciales (Vol. II). Barcelona: Paidós.
____ (2005a). El poder psiquiátrico. Curso 1973-1974. Buenos Aires: FCE.
____ (2005b): Historia de la sexualidad1. La voluntad del saber. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
FRIEDAN, B. (1963): La mística de la Feminidad. Madrid: Cátedra.
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1979): El lenguaje como semiótica social. México D.F.: FCE.
____ (1985): An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
HODGE, R., y KRESS, G. (1988): Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICAS (INE) (2017). Síntesis de resultados Censo 2017. Disponible en: https://www.censo2017.cl/descargas/home/sintesis-de-resultados-censo2017.pdf
JOCELYN, A. (2014): Historia General de Chile III: Amos, señores y patricios. Santiago: Editorial Sudamericana.
KRESS, G., y LEEUWEN, T. (2006): Reading images. The grammar of visual design (2nd. Ed.). London: Routledge.
LEEUWEN, T. (2005): Introducing Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge.
MASSIMO, R. (2011). Internet y control social, entre rizoma y gran hermano. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 4 (1), pp. 42-52.
MCWHINNEY, I. (1996): Medicina de familia. Madrid: Mosby/Doyma Libros.
MINISTERIO DE JUSTICIA (2004). Establece nueva Ley de Matrimonio Civil (Ley 19947). Gobierno de Chile. Disponible en:
https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=225128
MONTECINO, S. (1991): Madres y huachos. Alegorías del mestizaje chileno. Santiago: CEDEM.
MORA, C. (2003): Desigualdad en Chile: La continua relevancia del género. Santiago: Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
MORGAN, L. (1987). La sociedad primitiva. Madrid: Edymon.
PINTO, S. (1990): Matrimonio y mestizaje en Chile colonial. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
RICH, A. (1996): Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5 (4), pp. 631-660.
ROUDINESCO, E. (2007): La familia en desorden. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
RUBIN, G. (1986): El tráfico de mujeres: Notas sobre la “economía política” del sexo. Nueva Antropología, 8 (30), pp. 95-145.
SHERBOURNE, C., y STEWART, A. (1991): The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32 (6), pp. 705-714.
VALDÉS, X. (2007): La vida en común: Familia y vida privada en Chile y el medio rural en la segunda mitad del siglo XX. Santiago: LOM.
____ (2009): Metamorfosis de la Familia y la vida privada. Cambios y tendencias en Chile. Concepción: Universidad del Bío-Bío.
VENTURA, R. (2015). La sexualidad mediada: Estudio de la heteronormatividad en los informativos de televisión. (Tesis Doctoral). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, España.
WITTIG, M. (2016 [1992]): El pensamiento heterosexual y otros ensayos (3ra Ed.). Barcelona/Madrid: Egales Editorial.
Similar Articles
- Paula Pochintesta, María Florencia Baglione, Images about old age and ageing in Internet memes , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): July - December
- Miguel Alejandro Chamorro Maldonado, Discourse semiotics of historical memory on the internet. Traces of memories in Chilean and Spanish fiction series and their convergence with social networks , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): September - December
- Sergio Octavio Contreras Padilla, Collective action in network and political perception of netizens in Mexico , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Mavi Corell-Doménech, Alternative therapists in Mexico and the WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023: communication, beliefs and socio-economic factors , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June
- Elena Francés Tecles, Ramón Camaño Puig, Internal communication in primary health centers: A nursing perspective , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): July - December
- Massimo Ragnedda, Internet y control social: Entre rizoma y Gran Hermano. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011): Enero - Agosto
- Luis Fernando Cuervo, Julián Andrés Burgos, Adriana Ángel-Botero, Children‘s identification processes with television characters: case studies about colombian children and their favorite cartoon programs. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2013): Setiembre – Diciembre
- Natalia Raimondo Anselmino, Alejandro Sambrana, Ana Laura Cardoso, José Rostagno, Paratextual and paralinguistic resources in the fanpages of the Argentine newspapers Clarín and La Nación. Attributes of press discourse in social networking sites , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Alicia de Lara González, José Alberto García-Avilés, Study about online video quality in science communication , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June
- Laura Andrea Aceituno Castillo, The journalistic treatment of the news related to dengue and zika viruses in the digital media of Honduras (2010-2017) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Perspectivas de la Comunicación - ISSN 0718-4867

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).