Study about online video quality in science communication

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48672019000100185

Abstract

Communicators and scientific journalists who work in the communication of popular science face certain peculiarities typical of this specialized area: communicating complex concepts and making them attractive to the general public. To achieve this goal, and taking into account that the internet and online video have become great allies of science divulgation, the journalist needs to know and master the peculiarities of online scientific video. The objective of this research is to determine what features make online video an effective tool to communicate science. The methodology used combines qualitative and quantitative techniques. On the one hand, it carries out a content analysis on a sample of 900 online videos on science, specifically on three current scientific topics: vaccines, nanotechnology and climate change. And, in parallel, interviews have also been conducted with a panel of nine experts: scientific journalists, producers, academics and web video experts. The conclusions suggest that online videos about science, of very various types, are usually brief and easy to understand, with a mainly informative objective. Despite the recommendations of the experts, they do not usually have elements of entertainment.

Palabras Clave

Online Video , Science , Popular Science , Internet , Scientific Journalism
  • Pages: 185-207
  • Date Published: 2019-08-08
  • Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June

BUCCHI, M., & TRENCH, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge. Londres.

CALVO HERNANDO, M. (1997). Manual de periodismo científico. Editorial Bosch. Madrid.

CISCO (1st June 2016). Cisco White paper: Cisco VNI Forecast and Methodology, 2015–2020. Recuperado de: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/complete-white-paper-c11-481360.html Fecha de consulta: enero 2018

DE LARA, A., GARCÍA-AVILÉS, J. A., y REVUELTA, G. (2017). Online vídeo on climate change: a comparison between television and web formats. Journal of Science Communication, 16(01), 1-32.

DELOITTE (2013). White Smoke: The New Era For Vídeo News. Associated Press. Recuperado de: https://www.ap.org/research/vídeo-news-insights/whitesmoke/english.html Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

ELOGIA (2015). II Estudio anual IAB Spain TV Conectada y Vídeo Online. Disponible en: https://iabspain.es/wp-content/uploads/Estudio-TVC-y-Vídeo_Online_2015_Abierta.pdf Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

ERVITI, M. C., & STENGLER, E. (2016). Online science vídeos: an exploratory study with major professional content providers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Science Communication, 15(6), A06.)

FECYT (2016). Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología 2016. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Disponible en: https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/percepcion-social-de-la-ciencia-y-la-tecnologia-en-espana-2016 Fecha de consulta: enero de 2018

FRANCESCUTTI, J.P. (2014). Los públicos de la Ciencia. Cuadernos de la fundación Dr. Antonio Esteve. Recuperado de: https://www.esteve.org/capitulos/documento-completo-12/ Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

GARCÍA-AVILÉS, J. A.; DE LARA, A.; ARIAS, F. y ORTEGA, A. (2016). El webdoc como herramienta de divulgación científica en internet: el caso del Lab de RTVE. En: El medio ambiente en el nuevo universo audiovisual.UOC. Barcelona. Editor: Bienvenido León, pp.161-180.

GARCÍA-AVILÉS, J. A. y ARIAS-ROBLES, F. (2016). Géneros periodísticos en los formatos visuales de Twitter: una propuesta de tipología. Textual & Visual Media: revista de la Sociedad Española de Periodística, (9), 101-132.

GONZÁLEZ CONDE, J. (2010). La ciberradio. Nueva alternativa de futuro para la radio. Juventud y nuevos medios de comunicación. Marzo 10 | nº 88, pp. 50-62

MARTÍN, B. (2013). Cuando los debates en salud pública se vuelven ofensivos. Medicina Social, 7(2), 99-107. Disponible en: http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/13sm-Spanish.pdf Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

MORCILLO, J. M., CZURDA, K., & TROTHA, C. Y. (2016). Typologies of the popular science web vídeo. Journal of Science Communication 15 (4). Disponible en: https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/04/JCOM_1504_2016_A02 Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

THELWALL, M., SUD, P. & VIS, F. (2012). Commenting on YouTube vídeos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (3), pp. 616–629. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21679

YOUNG, J. R. (2011), “TED, Known for big-idea conferences, pushes into education”, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Disponible en: https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/ted-known-for-big-idea-conferences-pushes-into-education/30094 Fecha de consulta: noviembre de 2017

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-08-08

How to Cite

de Lara González, A., & García-Avilés, J. A. (2019). Study about online video quality in science communication. Perspectivas De La Comunicación, 12(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48672019000100185

Issue

Section

Articles - Science communication in Ibero-America

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.