Digital Platforms, the Spread of Hate, and Politics: A Critical Analysis
-
Daniele Battista
dbattista@unisa.it
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3757Abstract
Introduction: This study examines the link between language and violence in the digital environment, with a particular focus on political communication. The use of online language can contribute to polarization, the spread of hate, and the normalization of verbal violence, which is sometimes a prelude to physical violence. Objective: The research aims to understand how language is used to escalate public debate and what linguistic strategies favor the legitimization of aggression in digital contexts. Methodology: Through a qualitative content analysis and a critical literature review, we have sought to analyze the state of the art, focusing on the role of digital platforms in the dissemination of extremist discourses and the reinforcement of social tensions. Results: The analysis shows that digital technologies amplify the influence of political leaders in shaping public discourse and spreading polarizing rhetoric. Discussion: The strategic use of language online not only influences public perception but can also foster radicalization and the normalization of hate. Conclusions: Understanding these mechanisms is essential to develop mitigation strategies that promote a more balanced and responsible public debate.
Palabras Clave
Altheide, D.L. (2015). Media logic. In Mazzoleni, G. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons.
Bastos, M., & Farkas, J. (2019). “Donald Trump is my President!”: The internet research agency propaganda machine. Social Media+ Society, 5(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865466
Battista, D. (2023a). For better or for worse: politics marries pop culture (TikTok and the 2022 Italian elections). Society Register, 7(1), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2023.7.1.06
____ (2023b). Knock, Knock! The Next Wave of Populism Has Arrived! An Analysis of Confirmations, Denials, and New Developments in a Phenomenon That Is Taking Center Stage. Social Sciences, 12(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020100
____ (2024a). TikTok Politics: Influenze e interazioni sociali. Meltemi.
____ (2024b). Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: an overview of deepfakes and their implications. Society Register, 8(2), 7-24. DOI: 10.14746/sr.2024.8.2.01.
____ (2024c). Quando la comunicazione politica è “senza freni” e diventa conflitto. Culture e Studi del Sociale, 9(1), 82-91. ISSN: 2531-3975.
____ (2025). Hate on the Screen: Dynamics, Causes, and Consequences of Aggressive Online Communication. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 16(32), 11-24. DOI: 10.7336/academicus.2025.32.02
Battista, D., & Salzano, D. (2022). Political storytelling and the “Giorgia’s Meloni case”. Central European Political Science Review, 23, 73-91. ISSN:1586-4197.
Battista, D., & Uva, G. (2024). Navigating the virtual realm of hate: Analysis of policies combating online hate speech in the Italian-European context. Law, Technology and Humans, 6(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3149
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press.
Bentivegna, S., & Rega, R. (2022). La politica dell'inciviltà. Laterza.
Campus, D. (2020). Celebrity leadership. Quando i leader politici fanno le star. Comunicazione politica, 21(2), 185-203. DOI: 10.3270/97903.
Citron, D. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Harvard University Press.
Cohen‐Almagor, R. (2011). Fighting hate and bigotry on the Internet. Policy & Internet, 3(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1059
Croicu, M., & Kreutz, J. (2017). Communication technology and reports on political violence: Cross-national evidence using African events data. Political research quarterly, 70(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916670272
De-Blasio, E., & Sorice, M. (2023). Il disordine informativo e l'odio in rete. Democrazia a rischio= Information disorder and online hatred. Democracy at risk. H-ermes. Journal of Communication, 2023(23), 217-243. DOI: 10.1285/i22840753n23p217.
Eldridge-II, S., García-Carretero, L., & Broersma, M. (2019). Disintermediation in social networks: Conceptualizing political actors’ construction of publics on Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1825
Fairclough, N. (2023). Critical discourse analysis. In Handford, M., & Paul-Gee, J. (Eds), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 11-22). Routledge.
Gili, G., & Maddalena, G. (2018). Post-verità e fake news: radici, significati attuali, inattesi protagonisti e probabili vittime. Media Education, 9(1), 1-16. ISSN: 2038-3002.
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New media & society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Groshek, J., & Al-Rawi, A. (2013). Public sentiment and critical framing in social media content during the 2012 US presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 563-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490401
Hangartner, D., Gennaro, G., Alasiria, S., Bahrich, N., Bornhofta, A., Boucher, J., Buse-Demirci, B., Derksena, L., Hall, A., Jochum, M., Murias-Munoz, M., Richter, M., Vogel, F., Wittwer, S., Wüthrich, F., Gilardic, F., & Donnay, K. (2021). Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118
Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Kyprianou, C., & Risius, M. (2020). How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice. Strategic Management Journal, 41(8), 1490-1527. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3156
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020). Polarization in America: Two possible futures. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 34, 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.008
Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.
Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2023). Retweet-BERT: Political Leaning Detection Using Language Features and Information Diffusion on Social Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 17(1), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22160
Levin, S.A., Milner, H.V., & Perrings, C. (2021). The dynamics of political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116950118
Marwick, A.E., & Partin, W.C. (2024). Constructing alternative facts: Populist expertise and the QAnon conspiracy. New Media & Society, 26(5), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ru4b8
Matsuda, M.J. (1989). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2320-2381. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289306
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., & Presmeg, N. (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13
Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481-1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244
Ott, B.L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical studies in media communication, 34(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
Parmelee, J.H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New media & society, 16(3), 434-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l'argumentation (Vol. 1). Presses universitaires de France.
Perloff, R.M. (2021). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
Phillips, W. (2015). This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. MIT Press.
Piazza, J.A. (2023). Political polarization and political violence. Security Studies, 32(3), 476-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2225780
Ruffo, G., Semeraro, A., Giachanou, A., & Rosso, P. (2023). Studying fake news spreading, polarisation dynamics, and manipulation by bots: A tale of networks and language. Computer science review, 47, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2022.100531
Sørensen, E., & Warren, M.E. (2025). Developing a theory of robust democracy. Policy & Politics, 53(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000050
Sorice, M. (2020). La «piattaformizzazione» della sfera pubblica. Comunicazione politica, 21(3), 371-388. Doi: 10.3270/98799.
Sunstein, C.R. (2018). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Van-Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De-Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
Wilson, A.E., Parker, V.A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2023). ‘# OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: Studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2459–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007
Similar Articles
- Estefanía Luzuriaga Uribe, Gabriela Baquerizo-Neira, Twitter/X in the 2021 presidential campaign in Ecuador: digital interactions and their projection in the political polarization of the following campaigns , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 18 (2025): (Publishing on a rolling basis)
- Alfredo Arceo Vacas, Rafael Barberá González, Sergio Álvarez Sánchez, The context of perception generated on Twitter for the Spanish electoral debates of December 2015 and June 2016: treatment of the credibility factors by the candidates , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Montserrat Vidal-Mestre, Alfonso Freire-Sánchez, Maria Fitó-Carreras, The journalistic discourse and the elements of message transmission in the podcast and the audiovisual docuseries of true crime. The case of El asesino de la baraja , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): January - December
- José Luis Torres-Martín, Andrea Castro-Martínez, Pablo Díaz-Morilla, Cristina Pérez Ordóñez, Women executives and creators in the audiovisual sector. Analysis of Spanish fiction series in the catalogs of Amazon Prime Video, Movistar+, and Netflix (2019-2021) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): July - December
- Baal Ulises Delupi, Carnival, all my life! Artivistic Resistance Speeches in Barcelona: The Case of Enmedio , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): January - June
- Teresa Velázquez García-Talavera, Marta Rizo García, The discourse of the far right and the crucial moments of political life , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 18 (2025): (Publishing on a rolling basis)
- Victoria Isabela Corduneanu, Dra., Carlos Muñiz, Dr., Martín Echeverría, Dr., Emotions in electoral context and political attention to mass media: affective intelligence or cognitive evaluation? , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Danielle Tavares Teixeira, Guidelines for a scientific communication policy for the University of the State of Mato Grosso (Brazil) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June
- Ramon Ramirez Ibarra, State, freedom, and ideology: digital narratives of the new right for Latin America , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): January - June
- Carlos Muñiz, Mexican contribution to the study of political communication. Bibliometric analysis of papers in open access journals , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): January - December
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniele Battista
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0) 
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
