Subjects of information in the age of algorithms: between hyperpredictability and uncertain experience
-
Mercedes Calzado
calzadom@gmail.com
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3780Abstract
Introduction: This article analyzes transformations in the configuration of informational subjects in the digital environment. The research is based on an ongoing study -interviews, focus groups, and surveys with 380 young people aged 18 to 34 in the city of Buenos Aires- aimed at exploring how an informational experience marked by hyperpredictability and, simultaneously, by elements of latent unpredictability is configured. Objective: describe the characteristics of contemporary informational subjects and to understand the dynamics that organize their relationship with information in a media ecosystem shaped by platforms and algorithms. Methodology: qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and a survey conducted with 380 young people aged 18 to 34 in the city of Buenos Aires. Results: three features of the hyperpredictable subject are identified: prompt verifiability, the over-explanation of events, and atemporal immediacy. These features are articulated within an information market shaped by logics of attention, surveillance, and assisted freedom. Discussion: the results reveal the emergence of experiences of distrust, anxiety, and humor that introduce margins of ambiguity in the relationship with information and complicate purely predictive models of informational behavior. Conclusions: the article proposes understanding contemporary informational subjects as the result of a constant oscillation between algorithmic control and uncertainty, and argues for the need to articulate qualitative and quantitative approaches in order to grasp this complexity. It also highlights the role of the researcher as a critical cartographer of a transforming landscape in which questioning and uncertainty constitute central tools for the production of knowledge.
Palabras Clave
Ang, I. (1996). Las guerras de la sala de estar. Nuevas tecnologías, índices de audiencia y tácticas en el consumo de la televisión. En Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (Eds.), Los efectos de la nueva comunicación (pp. 193–211). Bosch.
Arguedas, A., Robertson, C.T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R.K. (2022). Incidental exposure and the filter bubble: The impact of exposure to news via social media on knowledge about current affairs. Information, Communication & Society, 25(13), 1839–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1910911
Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. (2023). Nosotros contra ellos: Cómo trabajan las redes para confirmar nuestras creencias y rechazar las de los otros. Siglo XXI Editores.
Bajtín, M. (2003). La cultura popular en la Edad Media y en el Renacimiento: El contexto de François Rabelais (Obra original publicada en 1965). Barral.
Benjamin, W. (2021). El narrador: Consideraciones sobre la obra de Nikolai Leskov. Metales Pesados.
Boxell, B., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J.M. (2017). Greater internet use is not associated with increased political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612–10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114
Calvo, E., & Aruguete, N. (2020). Fake news, trolls y otros encantos de internet: Una guía para sobrevivir en la era de la desinformación. Siglo XXI Editores.
Calzado, M., Nappi, M., & Saavedra-Ríos, J. (2024). Informe exploratorio: Cómo se informan les estudiantes universitarios [Informe exploratorio, diciembre de 2024]. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Carrera de Ciencias de la Comunicación. https://comunicacion.sociales.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2024/12/Informe-Audiencias-2024.pdf
Costa, F.G. (2021). Tecnoceno. Taurus.
Costa, F.G., & Mónaco, J.A. (2023). Tecnopolíticas digitales y gobierno de los públicos en el siglo XXI: Un camino de investigación desde la Escuela IDAES. Papeles de Trabajo, 17(1), 93–101. e-ISSN: 1851-2577.
Costa, F.G., Mónaco, J.A., Covello, A., Novidelsky, I., Zabala, X., & Rodríguez, P.E. (2023). Desafíos de la inteligencia artificial generativa: Tres escalas y dos enfoques transversales. Question, 3(76), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e844
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R.K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national analysis of online and offline news audiences. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R.K. (2020). How young people in the United Kingdom consume news and why it matters for democracy. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
Foucault, M. (2011). El gobierno de sí y de los otros. Curso en el Collège de France (1982–1983). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Fraticelli, D. (2023). El humor hipermediático: Una nueva era de la mediatización reidera. Teseo Press.
Haidt, J. (2024). La generación ansiosa. Paidós.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (2006). Dialéctica de la Ilustración: Fragmentos filosóficos (Obra original publicada en 1944). Trotta.
Lasswell, H.D. (2013). Propaganda technique in the World War (Obra original publicada en 1938). Martino Publishing.
Livingstone, S. (2019). Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & New Media, 20(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418811118
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
Mitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P.J. (2018). Juventud, estatus y conexiones: Explicación del consumo incidental de noticias en redes sociales. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, (24), 131–145. ISSN 1870-7300.
Mónaco, J. (2022). La mercancía audiencia en la era de las plataformas. Hipertextos, 10(18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143924e058
Napoli, P.M. (2011). Ratings and audience measurement. En Nightingale, V. (Ed.), The handbook of media audiences (pp. 286–301). Blackwell Publishing.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C.T., Ross-Arguedas, A., & Nielsen, R.K. (2024). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.
Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2018). Gobernabilidad algorítmica y perspectivas de emancipación: ¿Lo dispar como condición de individuación mediante la relación? Revista Ecuador Debate, (104), 124-147. http://hdl.handle.net/10469/15424
Sadin, É. (2018). La humanidad aumentada: La administración digital del mundo. Caja Negra.
Sistema de Información Cultural de la Argentina – SInCA (Ministerio de Cultura). (2023). Encuesta Nacional de Consumos Culturales 2013/2023: resultados provisorios, mayo de 2023 [Informe preliminar]. Gobierno de la Nación Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2023/05/encc2023_informe_preliminar.pdf
Treisman, R. (2023, April 28). A magazine touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was actually AI. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2023/04/28/1172473999/michael-schumacher-ai-interview-german-magazine
Waisbord, S. (2020). ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva. Revista SAAP, 14(2), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.46468/rsaap.14.2.A1
Williams, R. (2011). Televisión: Tecnología y forma cultural (Obra original publicada en 1974). Paidós.
Similar Articles
- Alfredo Arceo Vacas, Rafael Barberá González, Sergio Álvarez Sánchez, The context of perception generated on Twitter for the Spanish electoral debates of December 2015 and June 2016: treatment of the credibility factors by the candidates , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Carlos Rusconi, Eugenia Roldán, Local media and political practices: notes for addressing mediatization. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): January - June
- Mariano Chervin, Hey boy, come, vote (we grownups will take care of politics). A discursive analysis of three opinion articles on the youth vote law in Argentina , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): September - December
- Enrique Pérez Fumero, Yamile Haber Guerra, José Raúl Díaz López, Larisa Zamora Matamoros, A journalistic model. A theoretical interrelationship of new electronic journalism and Twitter platform in the Latin American media landscape. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): Enero - Agosto
- Mariela Lucrecia Parisi, Author journalism 2.0: visibility and political self-representation , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): January - December
- José Luis Estrada Rodríguez, M, The 2018 electoral campaigns in Mexico: gender inequality in media coverage , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Pablo Andrada, Cristian Cabalin, Cristian Agurto, Effective measurement of the media competence of future Chilean communicators , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): January - December
- Jussi Parikka, What is media archaeology, 10 years later , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): January - June
- Flavia Demonte, Media narratives on COVID-19 in low-income neighborhoods, Argentina. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): January - June
- Virginia García Beaudoux, Ana Slimovich, Hard-public information and soft-private information posted by candidates on Instagram during the 2019 Argentinian electoral campaign , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): January - June
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mercedes Calzado

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0)
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).









