Acción política y frame analysis: Convergencias y divergencias entre media frame y marcos de acción colectiva.
-
Patricia Mariel Sorribas
pmsorribas@yahoo.com.ar
Downloads
Abstract
En el presente trabajo se abordan distintas modalidades de acciones políticas a partir de dos tipos de fuentes de información, primarias y secundarias, desde el enfoque del frame analysis. Con el propósito de establecer una caracterización esas modalidades, la indagación incluye un análisis comparativo entre el discurso público visibilizado y mediado por la prensa de cobertura nacional sobre los conflictos ocurridos durante 2007 y principios de 2008, y el discurso de diversos actores que han protagonizado distintos tipos de acciones políticas.Mediante tal estrategia comparativa se pretende conocer las similitudes y diferencias entre ambos registros en función de los énfasis establecidos al definir los diagnósticos, las identidades de los actores, las acciones políticas y las demandas. Por último, se indaga sobre las voces con mayor resonancia entre los medios de comunicación analizados y los entrevistados.
Palabras Clave
AMADEO, B. (2003). Cultura política y medios de comunicación. Trabajo presentado en el 6to Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Política de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político, Noviembre, Rosario - Argentina.
CAROZZI, M. (1998). El concepto de marco interpretativo en el estudio de movimientos religiosos. Sociedad y religión, 16-17, 33-59.
CHIHU AMPARAN, A. (2005). El análisis de los marcos en el discurso de los candidatos a jefe de gobierno en el DF en 1997. Comunicación y Sociedad, 4, 67-91
D'ANGELO, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870-88.
ENTMAN, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”, Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51-58.
FISHER, K. (1997). Locating Frames in the Discursive Universe. Sociological Research Online, 2(3).
FREEDMAN, P. (1997). Framing the partial birth abortion debate: A survey experiment. Trabajo presentado en el 1997 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 10-12.
GAMSON, W. (1992). Talking Politics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
GAMSON, W., Fireman, B. & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with Unjust Authority, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
GAMSON, W. & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. En P. Burstein, (Ed.), Equal employment opportunity: labor market discrimination and public policy, pp. 373 –394). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
GITLIN, T. (1980). The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
GOFFMAN, E. (2006). Frame Analysis. Los marcos de la experiencia. Madrid: Siglo XXI -CIS.
IGARTUA, J. y Humanes, M. (2004). Teoría e investigación en comunicación social. Madrid: Síntesis.
KINDER, D. & Sanders, L. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73–103.
KOENIG, T. (2007). Frame Analysis, Research Method. CCSR Publications. Extraído el 13 de agosto de 2009 desde: http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/frameanalysis
LÓPEZ MAYA, M. (2002), Protesta y cultura en Venezuela. Los marcos de acción colectiva, Buenos Aires: Clacso.
_______________. (2004). Venezuela 2001-2004: actores y estrategias. Cuadernos del Cendes, año 21, 56, Tercera Época, 105-128.
MAHER, M. (2001). Framing: An Emerging Paradigm or a Phase of Agenda Setting. En S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World, (pp. 83-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MCADAM, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
_______________. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics: strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement. En D. McAdam, J.McCarthy & M. Zald (Comps.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures,
and Cultural Framings (pp. 338-355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MEYER, D. (1995). Framing National Security: Elite Public Discourse on Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War. Political Communication, 12, 173-192.
NELSON, T., Clawson, R. & Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.
NELSON, T. & Kinder, D. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.
OLIVER, P. & Johnston, H. (2000). What a Good Idea! Frames and Ideologies in Social Movement Research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5 (1), 37 – 54.
SABUCEDO J. M. (1996). Psicología Política. Madrid: Síntesis.
SÁDABA, T. (2008). Framing: el encuadre de las noticias. El binomio terrorismo-medios. Buenos Aires: La Crujía.
SCHEUFELE, D. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49 (4), 103-122.
_______________. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming and framing revisited: another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, (2-3), 297-316.
SEMETKO, H. & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing european politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 2, 93-109.
SMILDE, D. (1999). The „Clamor por Venezuela”Ÿ: Latin American Evangelicalism as a Collective Action Frame. En C. Smith, & J. Prokopy (Eds.), Latin American Religion in Motion: Innovation, Complexity, and Unexpected Change, (pp. 121-141). Londres: Routledge.
SNOW, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. En: A. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, (pp. 133-155). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
TANKARD, J. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. En S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy y A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
TARROW, S. (1992). Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: constructing meanings through action. En A. Morris & C. Mueller (Comps.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, (pp. 174-202). New Haven: Yale University Press.
TARROW, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Similar Articles
- Pablo Matus, Magdalena Vitores, Claudia Ramírez Friderichsen, Generic frames on the front covers of the Chilean press related to the social outbreak of 2019 , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 17 (2024): (Publishing on a rolling basis)
- Francisco Sierra Caballero, Salomé Sola-Morales, Oppositional public space and cyberactivism, a materialistic reading of connective action , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Carlos Rusconi, Eugenia Roldán, Local media and political practices: notes for addressing mediatization. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): January - June
- Victoria Isabela Corduneanu, Dra., Carlos Muñiz, Dr., Martín Echeverría, Dr., Emotions in electoral context and political attention to mass media: affective intelligence or cognitive evaluation? , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Danielle Tavares Teixeira, Guidelines for a scientific communication policy for the University of the State of Mato Grosso (Brazil) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): January - June
- Alfredo Arceo Vacas, Rafael Barberá González, Sergio Álvarez Sánchez, The context of perception generated on Twitter for the Spanish electoral debates of December 2015 and June 2016: treatment of the credibility factors by the candidates , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Sergio Octavio Contreras Padilla, Collective action in network and political perception of netizens in Mexico , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): July - December
- Eduardo Raíces, From the secret Argentina to youth emergence. Cultural analysis and politics in the Peronist magazine Línea (1980-1982) , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): July-December
- Javier Abuín-Penas, Claudia Montero Liberona, How does the Chilean Ministry of Health communicate about cancer? Analysis of Facebook and Instagram posts from 2018 to 2023 , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): July - December
- Flavia Demonte, Media narratives on COVID-19 in low-income neighborhoods, Argentina. , Perspectivas de la Comunicación: Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): January - June
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Proposed policy to offer Open Access Journals
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution (CC -BY 4.0) 
that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to adopt licensing agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, to post it to an institutional repositories or publish it in a monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
