Problematic cases for documentary theory

Abstract

This paper proposes that a documentary should not be defined regarding the relation its content has with the world where the documentary is seen, i.e. regardless wether its content is “true”, since a documentary is not a documentary because its content is true. That is how we can escape the dangerous dichotomy true/false and properly understand the following problematic cases: documentary in conditional tense, conspirational theory documentary, militaristic propaganda, animated documentary and pornography. Throug the gap between a statement and its enunciation, studied by Jacques Lacan in Seminar XI, documentary can be studied deeply as a commitment with the enunciation beyond the statement. As problematic cases, they are crucial to understand fiction and non-fiction, and also to understand how we make sense out of the world and how we put the limits on the discursive construction of truth.

Palabras Clave

Documentary , Conspirational Theory , Militaristic Propaganda , Animation , Pornography
  • Pages: 177-195
  • Date Published: 2018-12-15
  • Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): September - December

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-12-15

How to Cite

Aguilar Alcalá, S. J. (2018). Problematic cases for documentary theory. Perspectivas De La Comunicación, 11(2), 177–195. Retrieved from https://www.perspectivasdelacomunicacion.cl/index.php/perspectivas/article/view/1877

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.