On polymaths and expanded literacies in times of artificial intelligences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3781

Abstract

Introduction: The acceleration imposed by developments in the field of artificial intelligence and the consolidation of data-driven ecosystems require a review of traditional conceptions of literacy. Faced with scenarios characterised by the algorithmisation of social and educational practices, it becomes necessary to broaden the conceptual horizon towards forms of literacy capable of critically questioning these phenomena. Objective: The main purpose of this article is to analyse the concept of expanded literacies and their relevance in the age of AI, defining their technical, critical, and sociocultural dimensions. At the same time, it seeks to propose polymathic thinking as an alternative approach to understanding contemporary complexity. Methodology: A theoretical-argumentative approach is adopted that articulates literature reviews on digital culture, education, AI, and socio-technical studies, together with reflections from teaching and research experiences. The analysis combines conceptual frameworks from different disciplines to problematise the effects of AI on knowledge production. Results: Multiple dimensions of expanded literacies are identified, including the management of digital identities, the understanding of algorithmic logics, the critical editing of AI-generated texts, and participation in collaborative practices. A distinction is made between factual and format hallucinations, highlighting the relevance of human curation and validation processes. The genealogy of polymaths is reconstructed as inspiring figures for developing anti-disciplinary perspectives. Discussion: The article problematises ethical, social, and pedagogical tensions in the age of AI, from algorithmic biases and the widening of inequalities to the commodification of education and standardisation under the guise of personalisation. Conclusions: It concludes that expanded literacies and polymathic profiles are essential to critically navigate current socio-technical environments, as they offer a fertile framework for guiding more creative and situated educational and cognitive practices.

Palabras Clave

artificial intelligence , polymaths , digital literacy , digital culture

Ahmed, W. (2019) The Polymath: Unlocking the Power of Human Versatility. Wiley.

Anijovich, R. (2014). Gestionar una escuela con aulas heterogéneas. Paidós.

Anijovich, R., Cancio, C.I., & Ferrarelli, M. (2024). Abrazar la diversidad. De la reflexión a la acción. Paidós.

Berlin, I. (2016). El Erizo y el Zorro. Península.

Bhaskar, M. (2021). Human Frontiers: The Future of Big Ideas in an Age of Small Thinking. The MIT Press.

Burke, P. (2021). The Polymath: A Cultural History from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag. Yale University Press.

Carter, Z.D. (2021). El precio de la paz, democracia y la vida de John Maynard Keynes. Paidós.

Cheng, B., Cheng, J., Wang, C., & Leung, V. (2025). Pedagogical biases in AI-powered educational tools: The case of lesson plan generators. Social Innovations Journal, 30(2), 1-8. ISSN: 2692-2053.

Corona-Rodríguez, J.M. (2018). De la alfabetización a los alfabetismos: aprendizaje y participación DIY de Fans y Makers mexicanos. Comunicación y Sociedad, (33), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i33.7073

Ferrarelli, M. (2021). Alfabetismos aumentados: Producir, expresarse y colaborar en la cultura digital. Austral Comunicación, 10(2), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2021.1002.fer

Johnson, P. (2007). Creators. From Chaucer and Durer to Picasso and Disney. Harper Perennial.

Orozco, G. (2011). La condición comunicacional contemporánea: desafíos latinoamericanos de la investigación de las interacciones en la sociedad red. En Jacks, N. (Coord.), Análisis de la recepción en América Latina: un reencuentro con perspectivas a futuro (pp. 377-408). Ediciones CIESPAL.

Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R.J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x

Piscitelli, A. (1980). Gregory Bateson, polígrafo. Revista Mutantia.

Raffaghelli, J. (2022). Educators’ data literacy: understanding the bigger picture. In Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J., Learning to Live with Datafication. Educational Case Studies and Initiatives from Across the World. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003136842-5

Rivera-Vargas, P., & Jacovkis, J. (2024). Plataformas digitales y corporaciones tecnológicas en la escuela. Una mirada desde los derechos de la infancia. Octaedro.

Williamson, B. (February 22, 2024). AI in education is a public problem. Code Acts in Education. https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2024/02/22/ai-in-education-is-a-public-problem/

Wulff, A. (2022). Magníficos rebeldes: Los primeros románticos y la invención del yo. Taurus.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Piscitelli, A., & Ferrarelli, M. (2025). On polymaths and expanded literacies in times of artificial intelligences. Perspectivas De La Comunicación, 18. https://doi.org/10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3781

Issue

Section

Articles - Artificial intelligence and network society: war and peace in the algorithmic village

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.